Should Joe have done more?

Joe Paterno, 85 year old Penn State U. legendary coach, was dismissed from his post because of his failure to report an alleged crime (a sexual encounter between a retired assistant coach and a 10 year old boy) to the authorities. He did report the incident to his organizational superiors but that was not deemed sufficient. Joe¬†said that he should have done more but ain’t hindsight so wonderful. I never read the Grand Jury report or any other doc that might give me better insight into why Joe did what he did. I presume the evidence before the Grand Jury was pretty graphic and convincing, otherwise it is hard to imagine that the PSU board would have taken such drastic action.

On the ethics issue, it seems to me that the young man who witnessed the incident should have done something then and there but the world is full of situations in which people turn their head away from, I imagine in this case, such a shocking event. Consider the story about an incident that occurred in China while I was there this past October. (see my post on this site)

Back to Joe–Joe, of course, did do the “right” thing by taking the matter up the hierarchy but it obviously wasn’t enough in the eyes of the media and I suspect the public. In the final analysis, what passes for the right thing to do is the responsibility of the individual–a well established wisdom among ethicists. Moral responsibility resides first and foremost with the individual, otherwise we exist in a world without ethics or morality, one that borders on if not indeed is ethical relativism or perhaps worse, “whatever you do is your business so long as it doesn’t harm me!”

I believe that part of the underlying “cause” of Joe’s failure to do more is a function of his longevity and perhaps age, even ten years ago. I have seen countless incidents of leaders falling off the ethical ladder b/c they became too comfortable with the people around them and their work environment. In other words, they just let their guard down and develop an ethical blindspot. No one is immune from ethical blindspots but I do believe that longevity in a position/office creates what the economists call a moral hazard.


3 responses to Should Joe have done more?

  1. On January 28th, 2012 at 2:45 pm , T. Harcourt Fortman said...

    Menzel makes a solid case for individual moral responsibility. His final assessment of Paterno is on the money. I reached the same conclusion: age precluded Paterno’s full consciousness of the event. Such events were not a part of any reality for his generation.

    I do not see recent events as having eroded his achievements as a coach, nor as a paragon of high standards in general. In addition, and as pointed out by Menzel, he was also the victim of encapsulation in a rarified environment.

    As I see it, it’s the administrators above him who fumbled the ball. The values of hush-hush and money trumped any other considerations. The kicker takes the blame if the snap was good–and it was good enough.

  2. On January 28th, 2012 at 8:13 pm , Sheri said...

    I think he should have done more, as well as the witness. Perhaps there wouldn’t have been as many children scarred over this incident if JoePa & McQueary would have done more. But God is their judge, not me.

  3. On May 3rd, 2013 at 12:29 pm , Leandro Schreiner said...

    The general meaning of ethics: rational, optimal (regarded as the best solution of the given options) and appropriate decision brought on the basis of common sense. This does not exclude the possibility of destruction if it is necessary and if it does not take place as the result of intentional malice.’,

    Newly released piece of writing straight from our own blog site

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« Back home
HTML Snippets Powered By :